Saltar para menu de navegação principal Saltar para conteúdo principal Saltar para rodapé do site
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 23 N.º 3 (2020): Novembro

CRITERIOS DE CLASIFICACIÓN EN NIÑOS DE PREESCOLAR UTILIZANDO LOS BLOQUES LÓGICOS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.20.2332
Enviado
novembro 7, 2022
Publicado
2020-11-14

Resumo

O objetivo da pesquisa é identificar a evolução das crianças emcritérios de classificação e seriação usando os blocos lógicos deDienes e investigar as preferências de construção das crianças durante o desenvolvimento do brincar livre. A metodologia utilizada foi um estudo descritivo, utilizando um código de observação, previamente construído. Os resultados mostraram que cor e tamanho são as características que as crianças mais rapidamente identificam e com as quais possuem maior familiaridade. Um pouco perto dos anteriores é a forma. A espessura é a característica menos observada. Na semana 7, eles começam a realizar serializações por 2 critérios simultâneos, sendo completados pela maioria ao final de 9 semanas. Em termos de preferências de construção, as crianças preferemrecriar o mundo de fantasia de suas histórias do que os objetos de sua vida cotidiana.

Referências

  1. Alcaldía mayor de Bogotá, Secretaría distrital de integración social, (2013). Lineamiento pedagógico y curricular para la educación inicial en el Distrito, Bogotá: DVO Universal
  2. Bingham-Newman, A. M., & Hooper, F. H. (1974). Classification and seriation instruction and logical task performance in the preschool. American Educational Research Journal, 11(4), 379-393. doi.org/10.3102/00028312011004379
  3. Bokosmaty, S., Mavilidi, M. F., & Paas, F. (2017). Making versus observing manipulations of geometric properties of triangles to learn geometry using dynamic geometry software. Computers and Education, 113, 313-326. doi. 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.008.
  4. Bonny, J. W., & Lourenco, S. F. (2015). Individual differences in children’s approximations of area correlate with competence in basic geometry. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 16-24. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.001.
  5. Caldera, Y. M., Culp, A. M., O’Brien, M., Truglio, R. T., Álvarez, M., & Huston, A. C. (1999). Children’s play preferences, construction play with blocks, and visual-spatial skills: Are they related? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23(4), 855-872. doi.org/10.1080/016502599383577.
  6. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the building blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136-163. doi: 10.2307/30034954.
  7. Castro Martínez, E., Olmo Romero, M. Á. D., & Castro Martínez, E. (2002). Desarrollo del pensamiento matemático infantil. Universidad de Granada. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación. Departamento de Didáctica de la Matemática.
  8. Etchepareborda, M. C., & Abad-Mas, L. (2005). Memoria de trabajo en los procesos básicos del aprendizaje. Revista de neurología, 40(1), 79-83. chttps://europepmc.org/article/med/15736098
  9. Elia, L., Evangelou, K., Hadjittoouli, K., & van de Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). A kindergartner’suse of gestures when solving a geometrical problem in different spaces of constructed representation. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, RELIME, 17(4), 199-220.doi.org/10.12802/relime.13.17410.
  10. Gathercole, S., Pickering, S. J., Knight, C., & Stegmann, Z. (2004). Working Memory Skills and Educational Attainment: Evidence from National Curriculum Assessments at 7 and 14 Years of Age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.934
  11. García, G. S. M., Moreno, M. M., Tyteca, P. P., & De la Vega, M. L. C. (2018). Trayectoria de aprendizaje de la longitud y su medida como instrumento conceptual usado por futuros maestrosde educación infantil. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, RELIME, 21(2), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.18.2124
  12. García, A., & Vivas, J. (2018). Diferencias en la categorización de seres vivos y objetos Estudio enniños de edad escolar. Suma Psicológica, 25(1), 62-69. doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2018.v25.n1.7.
  13. Gejard, G., & Melander, H. (2018). Mathematizing in preschool: Children’s participation in geometrical discourse. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(4), 495-511. doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1487143
  14. Gibson, B. M., Leichtman, M. D., Kung, D. A., & Simpson, M. J. (2007). Use of landmark features and geometry by children and adults during a two-dimensional search task. Learning and Motivation, 38(1), 89-102. doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2006.09.002.
  15. Giofrè, D., Mammarella, I. C., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). The relationship among geometry, working memory, and intelligence in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123, 112-128. doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.002
  16. Giofrè, D., Mammarella, I. C., Ronconi, L., & Cornoldi, C. (2013). Visuospatial working memory in intuitive geometry, and in academic achievement in geometry. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 114-122. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.012.
  17. Hederich - Martínez, C., & Camargo - Uribe, Á. (2014). Análisis psicométrico de la prueba de intersección de figuras (FIT). Suma Psicológica, 21(2), 89-98. doi: 10.1016/S0121-4381(14)70011-6
  18. Hohmann, M., Weikart, D., & Epstein, A. (2019). La educación de los niños pequeños. Manual de High Scope para los profesionales de la educación infantil, volumen 1. Graciela Borja (ed.). México: High Scope Press.
  19. López, M. (2013). Rendimiento académico: su relación con la memoria de trabajo. Actualidades investigativas en educación, 13(3), 168-186. https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1409-47032013000300008
  20. Lourenco, S. F., & Cabrera, J. (2015). The potentiation of geometry by features in human children:Evidence against modularity in the domain of navigation. Journal of Experimental Child psychology, 140, 184-196. doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.007.
  21. Martínez, N. S., Rojas, P. J., & Rojas, N. L. (2018). Estrategias de los niños en la resolución de situaciones multiplicativas: reconocimiento y uso de unidades. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 21(2), 157-181. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.18.2122
  22. Mercer, M. E., Drodge, S. C., Courage, M. L., & Adams, R. J. (2014). A pseudoisochromatic test of color vision for human infants. Vision Research, 100, 72-77. doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.006.
  23. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2015). Resumen Ejecutivo Colombia en PISA 2015 - Icfes.Recuperado de www.icfes.gov.co.
  24. Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862. http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/GNEIP07_es.pdf.
  25. Motoki, K., Saito, T., Nouchi, R., Kawashima, R., & Sugiura, M. (2019). Light colors and comfortable warmth: Crossmodal correspondences between thermal sensations and color lightness influence consumer behavior. Food Quality and Preference, 72, 45-55. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.09.004.
  26. Negen, J., Roome, H. E., Keenaghan, S., & Nardini, M. (2018). Effects of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional landmark geometry and layout on young children’s recall of locations from new viewpoints. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 170, 1-29. doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.009.
  27. Nicholson, J. S., Barton, J. M., & Simons, A. L. (2018). Ability to categorize food predicts hypothetical food choices in head start preschoolers. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50(3), 238-246. doi.10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.026.
  28. Öngören, S., & Turcan, A. İ. (2009). The effectiviness of montessori education method in the acquisition of concept of geometrical shapes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1163-1166. doi.10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.209.
  29. Piaget, J. e Inhelder, B. (2013). The Child’s Conception of Space. London: Routledge.
  30. Piaget, J., & Teóricos, A. (1976). Desarrollo cognitivo. España: Fomtaine
  31. Pogozhina, I. (2016). Comparative study of the degree of relationship between logical thinking operational structures development levels in Russian and Chinese preschoolers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 233, 492-497. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.201.
  32. Ramírez, L. E., Gómez, A. V., & Zúñiga, D. V. (2018). Geometría en la práctica cotidiana: La mediciónde distancias inaccesibles en una obra del siglo XVI. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, RELIME, 21(3), 247-274. doi.org/10.12802/relime.18.2131.
  33. Resnick, I., Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2016). Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 358-365. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.007.
  34. Schmitt, S. A., Korucu, I., Napoli, A. R., Bryant, L. M., & Purpura, D. J. (2018). Using block play to enhance preschool children’s mathematics and executive functioning: A randomized controlled trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44, 181-191. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.04.006.
  35. Ünlü, M., Avcu, S., & Avcu, R. (2010). The relationship between geometry attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs towards geometry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1325-1329. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.328.
  36. Verdine, B. N., Zimmermann, L., Foster, L., Marzouk, M. A., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. (2018). Effects of geometric toy design on parent–child interactions and spatial language. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 126-141. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.015.
  37. Vesga Bravo, G., & de Losada, M. (2018). Creencias epistemológicas de docentes de matemáticas en formación y en ejercicio sobre las matemáticas, su enseñanza y aprendizaje. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (74), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num74-6909.
  38. Vidermanova, K., & Vallo, D. (2015). Practical geometry tasks as a method for teaching active learning in geometry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1796-1800. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.421.
  39. Yang, T. X., Xie, W., Chen, C. S., Altgassen, M., Wang, Y., Cheung, E. F., & Chan, R. C. (2017). The development of multitasking in children aged 7–12years: Evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.003.
  40. Yousif, S. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2017). Are all geometric cues created equal? Children’s use of distance and length for reorientation. Cognitive Development, 43, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.04.001.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Artigos Similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Também poderá iniciar uma pesquisa avançada de similaridade para este artigo.