Saltar para menu de navegação principal Saltar para conteúdo principal Saltar para rodapé do site

Artículos

Vol. 25 N.º 2 (2022): Julho

TERCER ESPACIO: MODELO DE TAREAS MATEMÁTICAS CON RESPONSABILIDAD CULTURAL DESDE EL CONTEXTO INDÍGENA

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.22.2523
Enviado
junho 7, 2023
Publicado
2022-07-31

Resumo

O ensino das matemáticas em contextos indígenas desconhece,em geral, o conhecimento matemático e os estilos de ensino das comunidades, posicionando o domínio escolar ocidental. As consequências de est a quest ão levam a for mular u ma proposta que se levante dos povos indígenas, por isso esta pesquisa constr uiu-o o modelo de tarefas matemáticas com responsabilidade cultural (TMRC) no e do contexto mapuche em três territórios indígenas do Chile e as suas respectivas escolas. O trabalho com cada estabelecimento e o seu contexto familiar, realiza-se sob os ciclos de pesquisa e o processo de pesquisa ação participativa, a partir da qual se configura um modelo de TMRC com artefatos matemáticos, objetivos, atividades e gestão de aula como estruturas fundantes de um terceiro espaço integrado de forma dialógica paralela entre a cultura local e a escolar.

Referências

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Toward a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81, 217-238.
  2. Bernardi, L. D. y Caldeira, A. D. (2012). Critical Approach in Mathematical Education in an Indigenous School. Bolema-Mathematics Education Bulletin, 26(42B), 409-431. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-636X2012000200002
  3. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
  4. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T. y Teddy, L. (2009). Te Kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 734-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.009
  5. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E. y Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
  6. Bonner, E. P. (2014). Investigating practices of highly successful mathematics teachers of traditionally underserved students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9533-7
  7. Boon, H. J. y Lewthwaite, B. (2015). Development of an instrument to measure a facet of quality teaching: Culturally responsive pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.002
  8. Borromeo, R. y Lesh, R. (2013) Should Interpretation Systems Be Considered to Be Models if They Only Function Implicitly?. En G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum y J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching Mathematical Modelling: Connecting to Research and Practice (pp. 57-66). Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_4
  9. Brousseau, G. (2007). Iniciación al estudio de la teoría de las situaciones didácticas. Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal.
  10. Cantoral, R., Montiel, G. y Reyes-Gasperini, D. (2015). El programa socioepistemológico de investigación en matemática educativa: el caso de Latinoamérica. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 18(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.13.1810
  11. Chandía, E., Huencho, A., Rivas, H. y Ortíz, A. (2018). Knowledge displayed by pedagogy students in primary education when designing a mathematical task. Bolema - Mathematics Education Bulletin, 32(61), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v32n61a14
  12. Depaepe, F. y König, J. (2018). General pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and instructional practice: Disentangling their relationship in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.003
  13. Gay, G. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839022000014349
  14. Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347320
  15. Goodchild, S. (2014). Mathematics teaching development: learning from developmental research in Norway. ZDM – the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-0130567-6
  16. Greer, B. (2013). Teaching through ethnomathematics: possibilities and dilemmas. En M. Berger, K. Brodie, V. Frith y K. LeRoux (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, (Vol. 1-2, pp. 282-290). Hoerikwaggo: Mathematics Education & Soc.
  17. Huencho, A., Chandía, E., Rojas., F. y Williamson, G. (2021). Model of the development of mathematical knowledge from the Knowing and Doing of the Mapuche people. Educación Matemática, 33(2), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3302.01
  18. Huencho, A., Rojas, F. y Webb, A. (2017). Educación Matemática Intercultural: Propuestas y Proyecciones desde el pueblo Mapuche. En E. Treviño, L. Morawietz, C. Villalobos y E. Villalobos (Eds.), Educación Intercultural en Chile. Experiencias, Pueblos y Territorios, (pp. 301-331). Santiago de Chile: Ediciones UC.
  19. Lesh, R. y Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and Modeling Perspectives on the Development of Students and Teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2-3), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2003.9679996
  20. Mansilla, J., Llancavi, D., Mieres, M. y Montanares, E. (2016). Instalación de la escuela monocultural en la Araucanía, 1883-1910: dispositivos de poder y Sociedad Mapuche. Educacão e Pesquisa, 42(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201603140562
  21. Mpofu, V., Otulaja, F. y Mushayikwa, E. (2014). Towards culturally relevant classroom science: A theoretical framework focusing on traditional plant healing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9508-5
  22. Nasir, N. S., Hand, V. y Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and Mathematics in School: Boundaries Between “Cultural” and “Domain” Knowledge in the Mathematics Classroom and Beyond. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 128-130. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308962
  23. Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007). Teachers’ stances and practical arguments regarding a science - indigenous knowledge curriculum: Part 1. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 963-986.
  24. Pais, A. (2011). Criticisms and contradictions of ethnomathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9289-7
  25. Parker, F., Bartell, T. G. y Novak, J. D. (2017). Developing culturally responsive mathematics teachers: secondary teachers’ evolving conceptions of knowing students. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9328-5
  26. Peña - Cortés, F., Huiliñir - Curío, V., Pincheira - Ulbrich, J., Quintriqueo, S., Quilaqueo, D., Gutiérrez, M. y Morales, S. (2018): Mapuche- Pewenche knowledge transmitted by teachers and parents: perception of schoolchildren in rural schools of the Araucanía region (Chile). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(3), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1505895
  27. Semali, L. M., Hristova, A. y Owiny, S. A. (2015). Integrating Ubunifu, informal science, and community innovations in science classrooms in East Africa. Cult Stud of Sci Educ, 10, 865-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9640-x
  28. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
  29. Stefoni, C., Stang, F. y Riedemann, A. (2016). Educación e interculturalidad en Chile: un marco para el análisis. Relaciones Internacionales, 48(185), 153–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.2016.44534
  30. Susman, G. (1983). Action Research: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. En G. Morgan, (Ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, (pp. 95-113). Newbury Park: Sage.
  31. Walsh, C. (2015). ¿Interculturalidad? Fantasmas, fantasías y funcionalismos. En F. Balseca y C. Montúfar (Eds), Ecuador. Desafíos para el presente y el futuro (pp. 269-282). Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar y Ediciones de la Tierra.
  32. Walsh, C. (2018). Decoloniality in/as Praxis. En M. Walter y C. Walsh (Eds.), On Decoloniality. Analytics, Concepts, Praxis (pp.15-102). Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2019.1597140
  33. Wences, I. (2021). Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y pueblos originarios. Lecturas desde la teoría de la justicia de Nancy Fraser. Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales, 23(46), 571-590. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2021.i46.28
  34. Williamson, G. (2008). Escuela Rural y Lof Mapu en La Araucanía. Revista Digital eRural, Educación, cultura y desarrollo rural, 5(9-10), 1-19.
  35. Zuchel, L. y Henríquez, N. (2020). Una crítica a la interculturalidad desde la interculturalidad crítica. Hermenéutica Intercultural, 33, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.29344/07196504.33.2298

Downloads

Artigos Similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Também poderá iniciar uma pesquisa avançada de similaridade para este artigo.