Saltar para menu de navegação principal Saltar para conteúdo principal Saltar para rodapé do site
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 14 N.º 3 (2011): Noviembre

O POTENCIAL DAS ATIVIDADES CENTRADAS EM PRODUÇÕES DE ALUNOS NA FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES DE MATEMÁTICA

Enviado
julho 14, 2023
Publicado
2011-12-01

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta e discute o desenho e a implementação de atividades centradas em trabalhos de alunos como uma estratégia de formação docente visando contribuir para o desenvolvimento do conhecimento do conteúdo e do conhecimento pedagógico do conteúdo nos cursos de formação inicial e continuada de professores de Matemática. Trazemos diversos aportes de pesquisas sobre o assunto e exemplificamos a nossa contribuição nessa área com a descrição da estrutura básica de tarefas que temos proposto a professores de Matemática do 6º ao 9º ano do ensino fundamental e do ensino médio e a análise de uma implementação específica. Fazemos uma apreciação do que aprendemos sobre a potencialidade das atividades apoiadas em trabalhos de alunos na formação de docentes de Matemática e a respeito de maneiras de construí-las.

Referências

  1. Ball, D.L. & Cohen, D.K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice based theory of professional education. In G. Stykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  2. Ball, D.L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21 (2), 132-144.
  3. Ball, D. L. (2000), Bridging Practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of teacher education 51 (3), 241-247.
  4. Begle, E. (1979). Critical Variables in Mathematics education: Findings from a survey of empirical literature. Washington, D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  5. Biza, I; Nardi, E. & Zachariades, T. (2007), Using Tasks to Explore Teacher Knowledge in Situation-Specific Contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 10 (4-6), 301-309. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9043-y
  6. Carpenter, T.P. & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research 17, 457-470.
  7. Crockett, M.D. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: creating dilemmas through teachers work. Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (5), 609-624.
  8. Driscoll, M. & Moyer, J. (2001). Using students' work as a lens on algebraic thinking. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 6 (5), 282-287.
  9. Doerr, H.M. (2004). Teachers' knowledge and the teaching of algebra. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra. The 12 ICMI Study
  10. (pp. 267-290). Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.
  11. Hill, H.C. & Ball, D.L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California's mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5),330-351.
  12. Kazemi, E. & Franke, M.L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7 (3), 203-235.
  13. Kaput, J.J. (1987). Representation Systems and mathematics, In C. Janvier (Ed.) Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19-26). Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Knuth, E.J. (2000). Student Understanding of the Cartesian Connection: An Exploratory Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31 (4), 500-508.
  15. Krebs, A.S. (2005). Analyzing Student Work as a Professional Development Activity School Science and Mathematics 105 (8), 402-411.
  16. Little, J.W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M. & Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at Student Work for Teacher Learning, Teacher Community, and School Reform. Phi Delta Kappan 85 (3), 184-192.
  17. Monk, D.H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review 13 (2), 125-145,
  18. Palis, G.L.R. (2003). Atividades para aprender Matemática para ensinar. Anais do III Seminário Internacional de Pesquisa em Educação Matemática, Santos, SP.
  19. Palis, G. L. R. (2005). Continuing education: Activities based on student work - how we did it and what we have learned from it. Paper apresentado na 15 ICMI Study Conference: The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics, Aguas de Lindóia, Brazil. Disponivel em http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMU/Palis_Gilda_ICMI15 prop.doc.
  20. Scago, N. & Goldsmith, L. (2006). Learning Mathematics for Teaching. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings 30 Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 5, pp. 73-80). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education.
  21. Shulman, L.S.(1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Educational Researcher 15(2), 4-14.
  22. Silver, E.A. (2006). Formação de Professores de Matemática: desafios e direções. Trad de O. Figueiredo. Boletim de Educação Matemática 19 (26), 125-152.
  23. Stacey, K., Chick, H. & Kendal, M. (2004). The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra, The 12th ICMI Study (Vol. 8). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer
  24. Stylianou, D. A., Kenney, P. A, Silver, E. A. & Alacaci, C. (2000). Gaining Insight into student's thinking through Assessement tasks. Mathematics teaching in the Middle School, 6 (2), 136- 144.
  25. Tardif, M, Lessard, C & Lahaye, L. (1991). Os professores face ao saber: esboço de uma problemática do saber docente. Teoria e Educação 4, 215-233.

Downloads

Artigos Similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Também poderá iniciar uma pesquisa avançada de similaridade para este artigo.