Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artículos

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2001): Marzo

MÚLTIPLOS, DIVISORES Y FACTORES: EXPLORANDO LA RED DE CONEXIONES DE LOS ESTUDIANTES: .

Submitted
March 11, 2025
Published
2001-03-31

Abstract

This study is a contribution to the ongoing research on preservice teachers’ learning and understanding of introductory number theory. The focus of this article is on fundamental concept of factor, divisor, and multiple; the meaning students construct of these three concepts; and students’ links among the three notions as well as their connections to other concepts of elementary number theory, such as prime factors, prime decomposition and divisibility. Nineteen clinical interviews in which students in a course for preservice teachers were asked to explain and exemplify the concepts and to apply their understanding in several problem situations were analysed focusing on the connections students made among the concepts. An examination of students’ responses showed that the meaning they assign to the concepts is often different from the meaning assigned by mathematicians in the context of number theory, and that their links among the concepts are often weak or incomplete.

References

  1. Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1992). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. En J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education (pp. 1-32). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
  2. Brown, A. (1999). Patterns of thought and prime factorization. Manuscrito enviado para su publicación.
  3. Brown, A., Thomas, K. & Tolias, G. (1999). Conceptions of divisibility: Success and understanding. Manuscrito enviado para su publicación.
  4. Campbell, S. & Zazkis, R. (1994). Distributive flaws: Latent conceptual gaps in preservice teachers' understanding of the property relating multiplication to addition. En D. Kirshner (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 268-274). Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University.
  5. Davis, R., Maher, C. A. & Noddings, N. (Eds.). (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph Series Number 4. Reston, VA: National Council of teachers of Mathematics.
  6. Ferrari, P. L. (1997). Action-based strategies in advanced algebraic problem solving. Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 257-264). Lahti, Finland. University of Helsinki.
  7. Ginsburg, H. (1981). The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(3), 4-12.
  8. Ginsburg, H. (1997). Entering the child's mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. En J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Nicholson, A. R. (1977). Mathematics and language. Mathematics in School 6(5), 32-34. Noss, R. & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meaning: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  11. Simon, M. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers' knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Alathematics Education 24(3), 233-254.
  12. Zazkis, R. (1998a). Odds and ends of odds and evens. An inquiry into students' understanding of even and odd numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics 36(1), 73-89.
  13. Zazkis, R. (1998b). Quotients and divisors.- Acknowledging polysemy. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(3), 27-30.
  14. Zazkis, R. & Campbell, S. (1996a). Divisibility and multiplicative structure of natural numbers: Preservice teachers' understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 540-563.
  15. Zazkis, R. & Campbell, S. (1996b). Prime decomposition. Understanding uniqueness. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 15(2), 207-218.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.