Aller directement au menu principal Aller directement au contenu principal Aller au pied de page
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 20 No 2 (2017): Julio

LA RESOLUCIÓN DE PROBLEMAS ARITMÉTICO - ALGEBRAICOS Y LAS ESTRATEGIAS DE APRENDIZAJE EN MATEMÁTICAS. UN ESTUDIO EN EDUCACIÓN SECUNDARIA OBLIGATORIA (ESO)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.17.2022
Soumis
juin 29, 2023
Publiée
2017-07-31

Résumé

Un des blocs essentiels de l’enseignement et l’apprentissage des mathématiques se compose de problèmes de mots et de leur  résolution; stratégies d’apprentissage encouragent l’autonomie et peuvent aider à prendre des décisions dans cette tâche  mathématique. Cette étude vise à relier la façon de résoudre des problèmes avec l’utilisation de ces stratégies. La recherche se fait  avec les élèves de 8º du secondaire, 9º et  10º. Les étudiants sont classés en trois groupes: le groupe de la résolution algébrique, la  résolution mixte et le groupe sans profil défini. Les stratégies d’apprentissage sont mesurées par un questionnaire. Le groupe  algébrique surpasse mixte dans diverses stratégies, en particulier dans les métacognitives. Le groupe sans profil défini utilise moins  de toutes les stratégies sauf répétition.

Références

  1. Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H. & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self - regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (1), 150-161. doi: 10.1037/a0030160
  2. Areepattamannil, S. & Caleon, I. S. (2013). Relationships of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies to mathematics achievement in four high - performing East Asian education systems. The Journal of genetic psychology, 174 (6), 696-702. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2013.799057
  3. Badia, A., Álvarez, I., Carretero, R., Liesa, E., & Becerril, L. (2012). Del aprendiz estratégico al aprendiz competente. En Estrategias y competencias de aprendizaje en educación (pp. 17-38). Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
  4. Balam, E. (2015). Learning Strategies and Motivation of Graduate Students: Is Gender a factor. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1, 1-9.
  5. Baroody, A., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38 (2), 115-131.
  6. Bednarz, N., & Janvier, B. (1996). Emergence and development of algebra as a problem- solving tool: continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. En N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra, perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 115-136).
  7. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  8. Berger, J. & Karabenick, S.A. (2011). Motivation and student’s use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21 (3), 416-428. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002
  9. BOPV (2007). Currículo de matemáticas en la ESO. Boletín Oficial del País Vasco, suplemento n.º 218. Obtenido de http://www.euskadi.eus
  10. BOPV (2016). Currículo de Educación Básica. Boletín Oficial del País Vasco, nº 9, 2016 / 141. Obtenido de http://www.euskadi.eus
  11. Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM, 40 (1), 3-22. doi: 10.1007/s11858-007-0067-7
  12. Chen, Z. (1999). Schema induction in children’s analogical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (4), 703-715. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.703
  13. Chiu, M. M., Wing - Yin, B., & McBride - Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 344-365. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.007
  14. Czuchry, M. & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). The generation and recall of personally relevant information. The Journal of experimental education, 66 (4), 293-315. doi: 10.1080/00220979809601403
  15. Davidson, J. E. & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47-68). New Jersey: LEA.
  16. Deulofeu, J., Figueiras, L., & Pujol, R. (2011). De lo previsible a lo inesperado en un contexto de resolución de problemas. Uno, 58, 84-97.
  17. Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self - regulation. En A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, y R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dodrecht: The Netherlands, Kluwer. doi:10.1007/0-306-47676-2_16
  18. Lai, K., Griffin, P., Mak, A., Wu, M., & Dulhunty, M. (2001). Modelling strategies in problem solving. Texto presentado en Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Perth, Australia.
  19. Liu, O. L. (2009). Evaluation of a learning strategies scale for middle school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27 (4), 312-322.
  20. doi: 10.1177/0734282908327935
  21. Mayer, R. (1986). Pensamiento, resolución de problemas y cognición. Barcelona: Paidós.
  22. McAfee, O. & Leong, D. J. (1994). Assessing and guiding young children’s development and learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  23. Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & Vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long - term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84 (4), 1475-1490. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12036
  24. NCTM - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  25. Núñez Pérez, J. C., González Pienda, J. A., García Rodríguez, M., González Pumariega, S., Roces Montero, C., Álvarez Pérez, L., & González Torres, M. D. C. (1998). Estrategias de aprendizaje, autoconcepto y rendimiento académico. Psicothema, 10 (1), 97-111.
  26. Pape, S. J. (2004). Middle school children’s problem - solving behavior: A cognitive analysis from a reading comprehension perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35 (3), 187-219. doi: 10.2307/30034912
  27. Perels, F., Gürtler, T., & Schmitz, B. (2005). Training of self - regulatory and problem - solving competence. Learning and Instruction, 15, 123-139. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.010
  28. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053003024
  29. Puteh, M. & Ibrahim, M. (2010). The usage of self - regulated learning strategies among form four students in the mathematical problem - solving context: a case study. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.061
  30. Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 student’s non - symbolic algebraic thinking. En Early algebraization (pp. 303-322). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_17
  32. Radford, L. (2014). The progressive development of early embodied algebraic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26 (2), 257-277. doi: 10.1007/s13394-013-0087-2
  33. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. & Schuh, J. (2010). The acquisition of problem - solving skills in mathematics: How animations can aid understanding of structural problem features and solution procedures. Instructional Science, 38 (5), 487-502. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9114-9
  34. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3-4), 299-323. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
  35. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. En E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 361–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  36. Stacey, K. & MacGregor M. (1999). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 18 (2), 149-167. doi: 10.1016/s0732-3123(99)00026-7
  37. Thiessen, V. & Blasius, J. (2008). Mathematics achievement and mathematics learning strategies: Cognitive competencies and construct differentiation. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2008.12.002
  38. Van Amerom, B. A. (2003). Focusing on informal strategies when linking arithmetic to early algebra.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54 (1), 63-75. doi: 10.1023/b:educ.0000005237.72281.bf

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Articles similaires

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Vous pouvez également Lancer une recherche avancée de similarité pour cet article.