Aller directement au menu principal Aller directement au contenu principal Aller au pied de page
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 18 No 3 (2015): Noviembre

LA NEGOCIACIÓN DE SIGNIFICADO COMO PROCESO DE APRENDIZAJE: EL CASO DE UN PROGRAMA DE DESARROLLO PROFESIONAL EN LA ENSEÑANZA DE LA ESTADÍSTICA

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.13.1834
Soumis
juillet 1, 2023
Publiée
2015-11-30

Résumé

Dans cet article, on décrit, à partir d'une perspective théorique sociale, le processus d'apprentissage sur lequel cinq enseignants de secondaire en pratique (troisième dégrée) ont donné des signifiés aux éléments, lesquels caractérisent la pensé statistique. Cette étude émerge lorsqu'on pris comme base un contexte de développement professionnel et, en particulier, un projet de développement lequel mis accent dans l'apprentissage du contenu statistique et de son enseignement. La méthodologie utilisée ont été l'Étude de Leçons, laquelle ont consistée dans la planification, implémentation et analyse de l'enseignement d'une leçon, dont objective a été développer des éléments de la pensé statistique chez les étudiants. On conclu que, lorsqu'on implique aux enseignants dans la réalisation des activités liées avec sa pratique, en salle de classe, et aussi que dans l'interprétation de documents sur lesquels on discute ces activités, favorisent des expertises de signifié lieu à son apprentissage.

Références

  1. Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F., & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 359-381. doi: 10.1007/s10649-005-5072-6
  2. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2005, Abril). Articulating domains of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Recuperado de www-personal.umich.edu/~dball/.
  3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  4. Batanero, C., Arteaga, P., y Ruiz, B. (2010). Análisis de la complejidad semiótica de los gráficos producidos por futuros profesores de educación primaria en una tarea de comparación de dos variables estadísticas. Enseñanza de la Ciencias, 28(1), 141-154.
  5. Burgess, T. A. (2011). Teacher knowledge of and for statistical investigations. In C. Batanero, G. Burril, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education: A Joint ICMI/IASE Study (pp. 259-270). New York, United States of America: Springer.
  6. Curcio, F.R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 382-393. doi: 10.2307/749086
  7. Figueras, O. y Rigo, M. (2005). Maestría en Educación, Especialidad Matemáticas. Plan y programas de estudio. D. F., México: Departamento de Matemática Educativa, Cinvestav.
  8. Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case Study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 301–316). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  9. Friel, S.N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G.W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124-158. doi: 10.2307/749671
  10. Garfield, J. B. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Collaboration in Teaching and Research. In J. B. Garfield & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), Developing students’ statistical reasoning. Connecting research and teaching practice (pp. 325-341). New York, United States of America: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8383-9_16
  11. Gómez-Blancarte, A. L. (2011). Un Estudio sobre el Aprendizaje de Profesores de Secundaria en Servicio: El Caso de un Proyecto de Desarrollo Profesional en Estadística (Tesis doctoral no publicada). Departamento de Matemática Educativa, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Distrito Federal, México.
  12. Hill, H. C., Schilling, S., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.
  13. Konold, C. & Miller, C. D. (2005). Tinker Plots. Dynamic Data Exploration. (Versión 1.0) [Computer software] Key Curriculum Press, University of Massachusetts. Leavy, A. & O’Loughlin, N. (2006). Preservice teachers understanding of the mean: Moving beyond the arithmetic average. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 53-90. doi: 10.1007/s10857-006-9003-y
  14. Lewis, C. (2000). Lesson Study: The core of Japanese professional development. Invited presentation to the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, L. A. Recovered http://www.lessonresearch.net/aera2000.pdf
  15. Lin, X., Genest, C., Banks, D. L., Molenberghs, G., Scott, D., & Wang, J-L. (2014). Past, Present, and Future of Statistical Science. London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  16. Mokros, J. & Russell, S. J. (1995). Children’s concepts of average and representativeness. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 20-39. doi: 10.2307/749226
  17. Pfannkuch, M. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ statistical thinking. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education: A Joint ICMI/IASE, The 18th ICMI Study (pp. 323-333). New York, United States of America: Springer.
  18. Pfannkuch, M. & Horring, J. (2005). Developing statistical thinking in a secondary school: a collaborative curriculum development. In G. Burrill & M. Camden (Eds.), Curricular development in statistics education: International Associations for Statistical Educations 2004 Roundtable (pp. 204-218). Voorbug, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institiute.
  19. Pfannkuch, M. & Wild, C. (2004). Towards and understanding of statistical thinking. En Dani Ben-Zvi & Joan Garfield (Eds.). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 17-46). Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  20. Pfeffermann, D. & Rao, C. R. (Eds.) (2009). Sample Surveys: Design, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  21. Pollatsek, A., Lima, S., & Well, D. (1981). Concept or computation: students’ understanding of the mean. Educational Studies in Mathematics 12(2), 191-204. doi: 10.1007/BF00305621
  22. Ponte, J. P. (2011). Preparing teachers to meet the challenges of statistics education. In C. Batanero, G. Burril, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education: A Joint ICMI/IASE Study (pp. 299-309). New York, United States of America: Springer.
  23. Powell, A.B., Francisco, J.M., & Maher, C.A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002
  24. SEP - Secretaría de Educación Pública (2011). Programas de Estudio 2011. Guía para el Maestro. Educación Básica. Secundaria. Matemáticas. D.F., México: SEP.
  25. Sowder, J.T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (Vol. 1, pp. 157-223). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  26. Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Barcelona, España: Editorial Paidós.
  27. Wild, C. & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-248.
  28. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Articles similaires

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Vous pouvez également Lancer une recherche avancée de similarité pour cet article.