Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 29 (2026): Publicación continua

Trayectorias de aprendizaje de Formadores de Profesores de Matemática para integrar la tecnología digital en la Formación Inicial Docente en Chile

DOI :
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.2026.29.e409
Publiée
2026-06-23

Résumé

Compte tenu de leurs responsabilités importantes et de leur autonomie, il est essentiel de comprendre comment les formateurs se préparent à accompagner les futurs enseignants dans l’intégration des technologies. Cette étude décrit les parcours d’apprentissage de dix formateurs de professeurs de mathématiques dans l’utilisation des technologies numériques au Chili, dans le cadre des nouvelles normes de formation initiale. Les résultats, analysés à l’aide du cadre de développement professionnel continu de Kennedy (2014) et des stratégies de Goos et Beswick (2021), suggèrent que les mécanismes d’apprentissage sont hétérogènes, qu’ils ne sont pas régis par les institutions, qu’ils sont principalement informels et s’inscrivent dans une dynamique « de bas en haut », menés par des formateurs partageant des intérêts communs autour de l’intégration des technologies et qui s’organisent pour élaborer des solutions communes. Quatre catégories équilibrées sont identifiées : les modèles transmissifs, malléables, transformateurs et d’autoformation.

Références

  1. Ávalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
  2. Braun, V., y Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., y Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
  4. Davor, I., Boateng, F. O., y Akweittey, E. (2026). Modeling the impact of teachers’ digital pedagogical content knowledge (DPACK) on instructional quality and student mathematics achievement. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1807792. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1807792
  5. Dockendorff, M., López, D., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., y Lavicza, Z. (2026). Technology integration levels and related beliefs of Mathematics Teacher Educators in Chile. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 21, 015. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2026.21015
  6. Dockendorff, M., Merino, R., y Gomez Zaccarelli, F. (2026). Challenges to using digital technologies in mathematics teaching and learning: the view of Chilean teacher educators. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1795323. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1795323
  7. Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., y Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9254-5
  8. Goos, M., y Beswick, K. (Eds.). (2021). The learning and development of mathematics teacher educators: International perspectives and challenges. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8
  9. Hoyles, C., y Lagrange, J.B. (Eds.). (2010). Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0
  10. Jacinto, H., y Carreira, S. (2026). Techno-Mathematical Fluency. Encyclopedia, 6(5), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6050101
  11. Kennedy, A. (2014). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.929293
  12. Lindenbauer, E., Bozkurt, G., y Yiğit Koyunkaya, M. (2026). Exploring a mathematics teacher educator’s knowledge and learning in designing and implementing a teacher training course on digital resource design. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-026-09745-2
  13. León Naranjo, J. R., Vargas San Lucas, G. J., y García Vásquez, H. R. (2025). El modelo TPACK como marco para la integración pedagógica de la tecnología en el aula. Aula Virtual, 6(13), e427. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15126677
  14. Ministerio de Educación de Chile (2021). Estándares de la profesión docente: Carreras de pedagogía. MINEDUC.
  15. Mishra, P., y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  16. Olanoff, D., Masingila, J. O., y Kimani, P. M. (2021). Supporting mathematics teacher educators’ growth and development through communities of practice. In M. Goos, y K. Beswick (Eds.), The learning and development of mathematics teacher educators: International perspectives and challenges (pp. 147–166). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8_8
  17. Park Rogers, M., Cross Francis, D., Mikeska, J. N., Kaur Bharaj, P., Gustaveson, A., Ogundapo, T., Kinsey, D., Lottero-Perdue, P. S., Howell, H., Shekell, C., Maltese, A., y Reich, J. (2026). Examining Mathematics and Science Teacher Educators’ Experiences with Digital Simulations Designed to Support Pre-Service Teachers’ Facilitation of Argumentation-Focused Discussions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 24(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-026-10657-z
  18. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Armand Colin.
  19. Reyes-Rojas, J., Díaz, B., Ruz-Reveco, C., Castro, A., y Reyes-González, D. (2026). Conceptualizing pre-service teachers’ readiness for AI integration into teaching practices: An intelligent-TPACK approach. Computers and Education Open, 10, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100320
  20. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., y Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748
  21. Uerz, D., Volman, M., y Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
  22. Valero Larico, D., Benavente Gutierrez, M. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., y Rucano Paucar, F. H. (2026). Digital applications in mathematics learning for secondary school students: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), em2768. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17760
  23. Weinhandl, R., Mayrhofer, J., y Bleckenwegner, V. (2026). Exploring Mathematics Teachers’ Views on Integrating Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in a Digital One-to-One Environment. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-026-00199-y
  24. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Articles similaires

1-10 sur 437

Vous pouvez également Lancer une recherche avancée de similarité pour cet article.