Saltar para menu de navegação principal Saltar para conteúdo principal Saltar para rodapé do site

Artículos

Vol. 29 (2026): Publicación continua

Trayectorias de aprendizaje de Formadores de Profesores de Matemática para integrar la tecnología digital en la Formación Inicial Docente en Chile

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.2026.29.e409
Publicado
2026-06-24

Resumo

Devido à sua elevada responsabilidade e autonomia, é fundamental compreender como os formadores se preparam para apoiar os futuros professores na integração das tecnologias. Este estudo caracteriza as trajetórias de aprendizagem de dez formadores de professores de matemática no uso da tecnologia digital no Chile, no âmbito dos novos padrões de formação inicial. Os resultados, analisados através do quadro de Desenvolvimento Profissional Contínuo de Kennedy (2014) e das estratégias de Goos e Beswick (2021), sugerem que os mecanismos de aprendizagem são heterogéneos, não são mediados institucionalmente, são principalmente informais e de «baixo para cima», liderados por formadores com interesses comuns em torno da integração da tecnologia, que se organizam para produzir soluções conjuntas. Identificam-se quatro categorias equilibradas: modelos transmissivos, maleáveis, transformativos e de autoformação.

Referências

  1. Ávalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
  2. Braun, V., y Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., y Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
  4. Davor, I., Boateng, F. O., y Akweittey, E. (2026). Modeling the impact of teachers’ digital pedagogical content knowledge (DPACK) on instructional quality and student mathematics achievement. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1807792. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1807792
  5. Dockendorff, M., López, D., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., y Lavicza, Z. (2026). Technology integration levels and related beliefs of Mathematics Teacher Educators in Chile. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 21, 015. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2026.21015
  6. Dockendorff, M., Merino, R., y Gomez Zaccarelli, F. (2026). Challenges to using digital technologies in mathematics teaching and learning: the view of Chilean teacher educators. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1795323. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1795323
  7. Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., y Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9254-5
  8. Goos, M., y Beswick, K. (Eds.). (2021). The learning and development of mathematics teacher educators: International perspectives and challenges. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8
  9. Hoyles, C., y Lagrange, J.B. (Eds.). (2010). Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0
  10. Jacinto, H., y Carreira, S. (2026). Techno-Mathematical Fluency. Encyclopedia, 6(5), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6050101
  11. Kennedy, A. (2014). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.929293
  12. Lindenbauer, E., Bozkurt, G., y Yiğit Koyunkaya, M. (2026). Exploring a mathematics teacher educator’s knowledge and learning in designing and implementing a teacher training course on digital resource design. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-026-09745-2
  13. León Naranjo, J. R., Vargas San Lucas, G. J., y García Vásquez, H. R. (2025). El modelo TPACK como marco para la integración pedagógica de la tecnología en el aula. Aula Virtual, 6(13), e427. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15126677
  14. Ministerio de Educación de Chile (2021). Estándares de la profesión docente: Carreras de pedagogía. MINEDUC.
  15. Mishra, P., y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  16. Olanoff, D., Masingila, J. O., y Kimani, P. M. (2021). Supporting mathematics teacher educators’ growth and development through communities of practice. In M. Goos, y K. Beswick (Eds.), The learning and development of mathematics teacher educators: International perspectives and challenges (pp. 147–166). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8_8
  17. Park Rogers, M., Cross Francis, D., Mikeska, J. N., Kaur Bharaj, P., Gustaveson, A., Ogundapo, T., Kinsey, D., Lottero-Perdue, P. S., Howell, H., Shekell, C., Maltese, A., y Reich, J. (2026). Examining Mathematics and Science Teacher Educators’ Experiences with Digital Simulations Designed to Support Pre-Service Teachers’ Facilitation of Argumentation-Focused Discussions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 24(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-026-10657-z
  18. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Armand Colin.
  19. Reyes-Rojas, J., Díaz, B., Ruz-Reveco, C., Castro, A., y Reyes-González, D. (2026). Conceptualizing pre-service teachers’ readiness for AI integration into teaching practices: An intelligent-TPACK approach. Computers and Education Open, 10, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100320
  20. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., y Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748
  21. Uerz, D., Volman, M., y Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
  22. Valero Larico, D., Benavente Gutierrez, M. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., y Rucano Paucar, F. H. (2026). Digital applications in mathematics learning for secondary school students: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), em2768. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17760
  23. Weinhandl, R., Mayrhofer, J., y Bleckenwegner, V. (2026). Exploring Mathematics Teachers’ Views on Integrating Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in a Digital One-to-One Environment. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-026-00199-y
  24. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Artigos Similares

1-10 de 437

Também poderá iniciar uma pesquisa avançada de similaridade para este artigo.