Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artículos

Vol. 20 No. 3 (2017): Noviembre

PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ’ ARGUMENTS REGARDING EXTERNAL DATA REPRESENTATIONS : LOGICAL, NUMERICAL, AND GEOMETRIC COMPONENTS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.17.2034
Submitted
June 28, 2023
Published
2017-11-30

Abstract

Arguing and representing are abilities promoted in the school curricula of many countries. This paper presents the arguments used by six students from grades one to four regarding external representations they created. The structure of the arguments is analyzed with respect to some of the components presented in these representations using Toulmin’s simple model, interpreting the  arguments, and integrating the representation created with the argumentation. Verbal and gestural argumentative elements  appear to be influenced by the students’ oral expression abilities and numerical and geometrical knowledge. The arguments about  the logical component, the variable, and about the numerical component the frequency, were verbalized by the students, while the  linear components, the linear basis and the graphical linearity, were argued for using spoken language, gestures, and metaphors.

References

  1. Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, (número especial), 267-299.
  2. Aoyama, K. (2007). Investigating a hierarchy of students’ interpretations of graphs. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2 (3), 98-318.
  3. Aparicio, E., y Cantoral, R. (2006). Aspectos discursivos y gestuales asociados a la noción de continuidad puntual. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 9 (1), 7-30.
  4. Corballis, M. (2003). From mouth to hand: gesture, speech, and the evolution of right handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 199-260.
  5. Del Pino, G., & Estrella, S. (2012). Educación estadística: Relaciones con la matemática. Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 49 (1), 53-64.
  6. English, L. D. (2013). Reconceptualizing statistical learning in the early years. In L. D. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 67-82). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6440-8
  7. English, L. D. (2010). Young children’s early modelling with data. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22 (2), 24-47.
  8. Estrella, S. (2016). Desarrollo matemático y estadístico: explorando su competencia meta -representacional. Actas de las XX Jornadas Nacionales de Educación Matemática, Chile, 20, 64-70. ISSN 0719-8159
  9. Franklin, C. A., & Garfield, J. (2006). The GAISE project: Developing statistics education guidelines for grades pre-K-12 and college courses. In G. Burrill & P. Elliott (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance 68th Yearbook (pp. 345–376). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  10. Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32 (2), 124-158. doi: 10.2307/749671
  11. Garcia - Mila, M., Pérez - Echeverría, M. P., Postigo, Y., Martí, E., Villarroel, C., & Gabucio, F. (2016). ¿Centrales nucleares? ¿Sí o no? ¡Gracias! El uso argumentativo de tablas y gráficas. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39 (1), 187-218. doi: 10.1080/02103702.2015.1111605
  12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science, 4 (2), 195-208. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4
  13. Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105, 395–438. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005
  14. Martí, E., & Scheuer, N. (2015). Sistemas semióticos, cultura y conocimiento matemático temprano. Estudios de Psicología, 36 (1), 9-17.
  15. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34 (02), 57-74. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
  16. Ministerio de Educación [MINEDUC]. (2012). Bases Curriculares de la Educación Básica, Matemática. Santiago de Chile: Autor.
  17. Ministerio de Educación [MINEDUC]. (2013). Matemática, Programa de Estudio para Primer Año Básico. Santiago de Chile: Autor.
  18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2009). Navigating through data analysis and probability in prekindergarten - grade 2 (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: Author.
  20. Pérez - Echeverría, M. P., Martí, E., & Pozo, J. I. (2010). Los sistemas externos de representación como herramientas de la mente. Cultura y Educación, 22 (2), 133-147.
  21. Pérez - Echeverría, M., & Scheuer, N. (2009). External representations as learning tools. In C. Andersen, N. Scheuer, M. Pérez - Echeverría & E. Teubal (Eds.), Representational systems and practices as learning tools (pp. 1-17). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  22. Piaget, J. (1965). The stages of the intellectual development of the child. Educational psychology in context: Readings for future teachers, 98-106.
  23. Saxe, G. B., Shaughnessy, M. M., Gearhart, M., & Haldar, L. C. (2013). Coordinating numeric and linear units: Elementary students’ strategies for locating whole numbers on the number line.
  24. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15 (4), 235-258. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2013.812510
  25. Sfard, A. (2009). What’s all the fuss about gestures? A commentary. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70 (2), 191-200. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9161-1
  26. Shaughnessy, J. M. (2006). Research on students’ understanding of some big concepts in statistics. In G. Burrill & P. Elliott (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance (pp. 77-98). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  27. Thompson, E., & Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neuraldynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5 (10), 418-425.
  28. Toulmin, S. (1958 / 2007). Los usos de la argumentación. Barcelona: Península.
  29. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Massachusetts: Addison - Wesley.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.