Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 25 No. 2 (2022): July

THIRD SPACE: MODEL OF MATHEMATICAL TASKS WITH CULTURAL RESPONSIBILITY FROM THE INDIGENOUS CONTEXTS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.22.2523
Submitted
June 7, 2023
Published
2022-07-31

Abstract

The mathematics teaching in indigenous contexts often ignores the mathematical knowledge and teaching styles of the communities, positioning the western school domain. The consequences of this, merit formulating a proposal that is raised from indigenous peoples, so this research builds a model of mathematical tasks with cultural responsibility (MTCR) from the Mapuche context in three indigenous territories of Chile and their respective schools. The work with each establishment and its family context is carried out under the research cycles and the participatory action research process, from which a modelo MTCR is configured with mathematical artifacts, objectives, activities and class management as a founding structures of a third space integrated in a parallel dialogical way between local and school culture.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Toward a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81, 217-238.
  2. Bernardi, L. D. y Caldeira, A. D. (2012). Critical Approach in Mathematical Education in an Indigenous School. Bolema-Mathematics Education Bulletin, 26(42B), 409-431. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-636X2012000200002
  3. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
  4. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T. y Teddy, L. (2009). Te Kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 734-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.009
  5. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E. y Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
  6. Bonner, E. P. (2014). Investigating practices of highly successful mathematics teachers of traditionally underserved students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9533-7
  7. Boon, H. J. y Lewthwaite, B. (2015). Development of an instrument to measure a facet of quality teaching: Culturally responsive pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.002
  8. Borromeo, R. y Lesh, R. (2013) Should Interpretation Systems Be Considered to Be Models if They Only Function Implicitly?. En G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum y J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching Mathematical Modelling: Connecting to Research and Practice (pp. 57-66). Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_4
  9. Brousseau, G. (2007). Iniciación al estudio de la teoría de las situaciones didácticas. Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal.
  10. Cantoral, R., Montiel, G. y Reyes-Gasperini, D. (2015). El programa socioepistemológico de investigación en matemática educativa: el caso de Latinoamérica. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 18(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.13.1810
  11. Chandía, E., Huencho, A., Rivas, H. y Ortíz, A. (2018). Knowledge displayed by pedagogy students in primary education when designing a mathematical task. Bolema - Mathematics Education Bulletin, 32(61), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v32n61a14
  12. Depaepe, F. y König, J. (2018). General pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and instructional practice: Disentangling their relationship in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.003
  13. Gay, G. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839022000014349
  14. Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347320
  15. Goodchild, S. (2014). Mathematics teaching development: learning from developmental research in Norway. ZDM – the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(2), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-0130567-6
  16. Greer, B. (2013). Teaching through ethnomathematics: possibilities and dilemmas. En M. Berger, K. Brodie, V. Frith y K. LeRoux (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, (Vol. 1-2, pp. 282-290). Hoerikwaggo: Mathematics Education & Soc.
  17. Huencho, A., Chandía, E., Rojas., F. y Williamson, G. (2021). Model of the development of mathematical knowledge from the Knowing and Doing of the Mapuche people. Educación Matemática, 33(2), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3302.01
  18. Huencho, A., Rojas, F. y Webb, A. (2017). Educación Matemática Intercultural: Propuestas y Proyecciones desde el pueblo Mapuche. En E. Treviño, L. Morawietz, C. Villalobos y E. Villalobos (Eds.), Educación Intercultural en Chile. Experiencias, Pueblos y Territorios, (pp. 301-331). Santiago de Chile: Ediciones UC.
  19. Lesh, R. y Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and Modeling Perspectives on the Development of Students and Teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2-3), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2003.9679996
  20. Mansilla, J., Llancavi, D., Mieres, M. y Montanares, E. (2016). Instalación de la escuela monocultural en la Araucanía, 1883-1910: dispositivos de poder y Sociedad Mapuche. Educacão e Pesquisa, 42(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201603140562
  21. Mpofu, V., Otulaja, F. y Mushayikwa, E. (2014). Towards culturally relevant classroom science: A theoretical framework focusing on traditional plant healing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9508-5
  22. Nasir, N. S., Hand, V. y Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and Mathematics in School: Boundaries Between “Cultural” and “Domain” Knowledge in the Mathematics Classroom and Beyond. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 128-130. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308962
  23. Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007). Teachers’ stances and practical arguments regarding a science - indigenous knowledge curriculum: Part 1. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 963-986.
  24. Pais, A. (2011). Criticisms and contradictions of ethnomathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9289-7
  25. Parker, F., Bartell, T. G. y Novak, J. D. (2017). Developing culturally responsive mathematics teachers: secondary teachers’ evolving conceptions of knowing students. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9328-5
  26. Peña - Cortés, F., Huiliñir - Curío, V., Pincheira - Ulbrich, J., Quintriqueo, S., Quilaqueo, D., Gutiérrez, M. y Morales, S. (2018): Mapuche- Pewenche knowledge transmitted by teachers and parents: perception of schoolchildren in rural schools of the Araucanía region (Chile). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(3), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1505895
  27. Semali, L. M., Hristova, A. y Owiny, S. A. (2015). Integrating Ubunifu, informal science, and community innovations in science classrooms in East Africa. Cult Stud of Sci Educ, 10, 865-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9640-x
  28. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
  29. Stefoni, C., Stang, F. y Riedemann, A. (2016). Educación e interculturalidad en Chile: un marco para el análisis. Relaciones Internacionales, 48(185), 153–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.2016.44534
  30. Susman, G. (1983). Action Research: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. En G. Morgan, (Ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, (pp. 95-113). Newbury Park: Sage.
  31. Walsh, C. (2015). ¿Interculturalidad? Fantasmas, fantasías y funcionalismos. En F. Balseca y C. Montúfar (Eds), Ecuador. Desafíos para el presente y el futuro (pp. 269-282). Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar y Ediciones de la Tierra.
  32. Walsh, C. (2018). Decoloniality in/as Praxis. En M. Walter y C. Walsh (Eds.), On Decoloniality. Analytics, Concepts, Praxis (pp.15-102). Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2019.1597140
  33. Wences, I. (2021). Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y pueblos originarios. Lecturas desde la teoría de la justicia de Nancy Fraser. Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales, 23(46), 571-590. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2021.i46.28
  34. Williamson, G. (2008). Escuela Rural y Lof Mapu en La Araucanía. Revista Digital eRural, Educación, cultura y desarrollo rural, 5(9-10), 1-19.
  35. Zuchel, L. y Henríquez, N. (2020). Una crítica a la interculturalidad desde la interculturalidad crítica. Hermenéutica Intercultural, 33, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.29344/07196504.33.2298

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.