Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2013): Marzo

WHAT KNOWLEDGE AND CONCEPTIONS MOBILIZE FUTURE TEACHERS ANALYZING A CLASSROOM VIDEO ?

Submitted
July 13, 2023
Published
2023-07-13

Abstract

The use of the Primary Education (PE) class sessions video in the initial training of teachers provides realism to the theoretical discussions of Master's degree classrooms, contributing to the link between theory and practice on the basis of reflective processes that help to transcend the normal general comments of teacher students (TS). The objective of this study is to identify the conceptions for the teaching and learning of mathematics, as well as the mathematical knowledge for teaching (particularly the knowledge of mathematics and the teaching and knowledge of mathematics and students) that a group of TS use when observing a PE video. Using a research design consistent with a teaching experiment (Steffe and Thompson, 2000) (in which an instructional design, aimed at TS, regarding the introduction of the concept of division, is refined by means of successive cycles of implementation and analysis), the way the analysis of teaching situations in PE promotes the questioning of TS is highlighted.

References

  1. Alsawaie, O. N. & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers’ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13(3), 223-241. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8
  2. Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on Teaching Mathematics: Making Subject Matter Knowledge Part of the Equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  3. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education 51(3), 241-247. DOI: 10.1177/0022487100051003013
  4. Ball, D. L; Thames, M. & Phelps, J. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education 59(5), 389-407. DOI: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  5. Bardin, L. (1986). L´analyse de contenu. Paris, Francia: PUF.
  6. Bravo, L. (1996). ¿Qué es el vídeo educativo?. Comunicar 6, 100-105.
  7. Brophy, J. (2004). Using video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 259-286). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  8. Carrillo, J. & Contreras, L. C. (1995). Un modelo de categorías e indicadores para el análisis de las concepciones del profesor sobre la matemática y su enseñanza. Educación Matemática 7(3), 79-92.
  9. Carrillo, J. & Climent, N. (2008). From professional tasks in collaborative environments to educational tasks in mathematics teacher education. In B. Clarke, B. Grevholm & R. Millman (Eds.), Tasks in Primary Mathematics Teacher Education: Purpose, Use and Exemplars (Vol. 4, pp. 215-234). New York, EE.UU.: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09669-8_15
  10. Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Seeing is understanding. Journal of Staff Development 21(4), 40-43.
  11. Climent, N. & Carrillo, J. (2007). El uso del vídeo para el análisis de la práctica en entornos colaborativos. Investigación en la Escuela 61, 23-35.
  12. Design-Based Researcher Collective (2003). Design- Based Research: An Emerging paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher 32(1), 5-8.
  13. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10), 906-911. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  14. Goffree, F. & Oonk, W. (2001). Digitizing real teaching practice for teacher education programmes: the MILE approach. In F. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 111-146). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: 1874/ 127929
  15. González, J. & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.). (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Informe final. Fase uno. Bilbao, España: Universidad de Deusto y Universidad de Groningen.
  16. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  17. Kazemi, E. & Hubbard, A. (2008). New Directions for the Design and Study of Professional Development: Attending to the Coevolution of Teachers’ Participation across Contexts. Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5), 428-441. DOI: 10.1177/0022487108324330
  18. Koc, Y., Peker, D. & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (8), 1158–1168. DOI: 10.1016/ j.tate.2009.02.020
  19. Lampert, M., & Ball, D.L. (1998). Teaching, Multimedia and Mathematics: Investigations of Real Practice. New York, EE.UU.: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
  20. Leikin, R. & Zazkis, R. (2010). Learning Through Teaching Mathematics. Development of teachers’ knowledge and expertise in practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  21. Lin, P. J. (2005). Using research-based video-cases to help pre-service primary teachers conceptualize a contemporary view of mathematics teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3, 351–377.
  22. Llinares, S. & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13 (2), 177-196. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9133-0
  23. Masingila, J. O. & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analysis of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 5 (3), 235–263.
  24. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London, England: Routledge Falmer.
  25. Mochón, S. & Morales, M. (2010). En qué consiste el “conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza” de un profesor y cómo fomentar su desarrollo: un estudio en la escuela primaria. Educación Matemática 22 (1), 87-113.
  26. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 62 (3), 307-332. DOI: 10.3102/00346543062003307
  27. Perrenoud, P.H. (2004). Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar. Barcelona, España: Graó.
  28. Ponte, J.P. (1994). Mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol. 1, pp. 195-210). Lisboa, Portugal: University of Lisbon.
  29. Rodríguez, P. (2000). Los medios como recurso reflexivo en las Prácticas para ser Maestro. Comunicar 14, 200-207.
  30. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C. & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: an empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 10 (2), 123-140. DOI: 10.1007/s10857007-9029-9
  31. Schuck, S. (1996). Chains in primary teacher mathematics education courses: An analysis of powerful constraints. Mathematics Education Research Journal 8 (2), 119-136.
  32. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15 (2), 4-14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  33. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review 57 (1), 1-22.
  34. Sorto, M. A., Marshall, J. H., Luschei, T. F. & Carnoy, M. (2009). Teacher knowledge and teaching in Panama and Costa Rica: A comparative study in primary and secondary education. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 12 (2), 251-290.
  35. Sosa, L. (2011). Conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza en Bachillerato. Un estudio de dos casos. Huelva, España: Universidad de Huelva. (Disponible en http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace// handle/10272/4509)
  36. Star, J. R. & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11 (2), 107-125. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
  37. Steffe, L. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Nelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  38. Viseu, F. & Ponte, J.P. (2009). Desenvolvimento do conhecimento didáctico do futuro professor de matemática com apoio das TIC. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 12 (3), 383-413.
  39. Zeichner, K.M. (1993). El maestro como profesional reflexivo. Cuadernos de pedagogía 220,44-49.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.