Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 25 No. 2 (2022): July

METACOGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF A MATHEMATICS CLASS ON SURFACE MEASUREMENT

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.22.2522
Submitted
June 7, 2023
Published
2022-06-07

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the practices that a teacher carries out with his students to solve a surface measurement problem in which aspects of a metacognitive nature intervene. A didactic proposal was designed, based on a diagnostic teaching methodology, in which the teacher proposes a task to bring out different personal meanings about the length and surface magnitudes, using Fletcher’s tangram. The instruction was carried out in a class of 26 14- year-old students who were in the 2nd year of Compulsory Secondary Education in Spain. For the analysis, constructs of metacognition and the Ontosemiotic Approach were taken as theoretical reference. Among the conclusions is that cognition and metacognition can be improved with well planned and responsibly executed instruction.

References

  1. Baten, E., Praet, M. y Desoete, A. (2017). The relevance and efficacy of metacognition for instructional design in the domain of mathematics. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49(4), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0851-y
  2. Balderas, M. J. C., Páez, D. A. y Martínez M. G. P. (2020). Discusión teórica sobre las prácticas docentes como mediadoras para potencializar estrategias metacognitivas en la solución de tareas matemáticas. Educación Matemática, 32(1), 221-240. http://www.revista-educacionmatematica.org.mx/descargas/vol32/1/10REM32-1.pdf
  3. Breda, A. (2020). Características del análisis didáctico realizado por profesores para justificar la mejora en la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Bolema, 34(66), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v34n66a04
  4. Breda, A., Hummes, V. B., Silva, R. S. y Sánchez, A. (2021a). The Role of the Phase of Teaching and Observation in the Lesson Study Methodology. Bolema (Rio Claro), 35(69), 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v35n69a13
  5. Breda, A., Seckel, M. J., Farsani, D., Silva, J. F., y Calle, E. (2021b). Teaching and learning of mathematics and criteria for its improvement from the perspective of future teachers: a view from the Ontosemiotic Approach. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(1), 31-51 https://commons.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2021/04/v13n1Teaching-and-learning-of-mathematics-and-criteria.pdf
  6. Brousseau, G. (1998). La téorie des situations didactiques. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
  7. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In David Tall (Ed.) Advanced Mathematical Thinking. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher), 153-166.
  8. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In David Tall (Ed.) Advanced Mathematical Thinking. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher), 153-166.
  9. Díaz, A., Pérez, M., González-Pienda, J. y Núñez, J. (2017). Impacto de un entrenamiento en aprendizaje autorregulado estudiantes universitarios. Perfiles Educativos, 39(157), 87–104. https://perfileseducativos.unam.mx/iisue_pe/index.php/perfiles/article/view/58442
  10. Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.). The nature of intelligence. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
  11. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquirí. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1980-09388-001
  12. Flavell, J. (1981). Monitoring social cognitive enterprises: something else that may develop in the area of social cognition. In Flavell J. y Ross L. (Eds.), Social cognitive development: frontiers abd possible future. (New York: Cambridge University Press), 272-287.
  13. Flavell, J. (1987). Speculation about the motive and development of metacognition. In Weinert, F. & Klowe, R. (Eds.). Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers), 21-29.
  14. Font, V. (2005). Una aproximación ontosemiótica a la didáctica de la derivada. En A. Maz, B. Gómez y M. Torralbo (Eds): Investigación en Educación Matemática. Noveno Simposio de la Sociedad Española de Investigación en Educación Matemática. (Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba), 109-128. http://funes.uniandes.edu.co/1303/
  15. Godino, J. D. (2002). Un enfoque ontológico y semiótico de la cognición matemática. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 22, (2/3): 237–284. https://www.ugr.es/~jgodino/funciones-semioticas/04_enfoque_ontosemiotico.pdf
  16. Godino, J. D. (2022). Emergencia, estado actual y perspectivas del enfoque ontosemiótico en educación matemática. Revista Venezolana de Investigación en Educación Matemática (REVIEM), 2(2), 1-24 - e202201. http://enfoqueontosemiotico.ugr.es/documentos/Godino_Emergencia_EOS_REVIEM_2021.pdf
  17. Godino, J. D., Batanero, C. y Font, V. (2019). The Onto-semiotic Approach: implications for the prescriptive character of didactics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39(1), 37-42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26742011
  18. Godino, J. D., Giacomone, B., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2017). Enfoque ontosemiótico de los conocimientos y competencias del profesor de matemáticas. Bolema, 31(57), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v31n57a05
  19. Gonçalves, Mª. C. M. (1996). A influência da Metacognição na aprendizagem: uma intervenção realizada na aula de matemática. [dissertaçao/dissertação de mestrado, Lisboa, Portugal]: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
  20. González, F. (1996). Acerca de la Metacognición. Paradigma, XIV al XVII, n.1, pp. 109 -135, jun.
  21. Gusmão, T. C. R. S. (2006). Los procesos metacognitivos en la comprensión de las prácticas de los estudiantes cuando resuelven problemas matemáticos: una perspectiva ontosemiótica. [tesis/ tesis doctoral, Santiago de Compostela, España]: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. http://enfoqueontosemiotico.ugr.es/documentos/Tesis_doctoral_Tania_Gusmao.pdf
  22. Gusmão, T. C. (2009). A estreita relação entre os modelos de resolução de problemas e a metacognição: uma questão de circunstancias. Boletim GEPEM / 54, 77-92. Rio de Janeiro. https://periodicos.ufrrj.br/index.php/gepem/article/view/318
  23. Gusmão, T. C.; Font, V. y Cajaraville, J. A. (2009). Análises cognitivo e metacognitivo de práticas matemáticas de resolução de problemas: o caso Nerea. Revista Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 11(1), 79-116, São Paulo. https://revistas.pucsp.br/emp/article/view/2134
  24. Gusmao, T. C. R. S., Cajaraville, J. A., Font, V. y Godino, J. D. (2014). El Caso Victor: dificultades metacognitivas en la resolución de problema. Bolema [online], 28(48), 255-275. Rio Claro, São Paulo. https://www.scielo.br/j/bolema/a/W4CxvyxGxdFnq8zBdH4LxQQ/abstract/?lang=es
  25. Jiménez R. V.; Puente F. A. (2014). Modelo de estrategias metacognitivas. Revista de Investigación Universitaria, 3 (1), 11-16. doi.org/10.17162/riu.v3i1.36
  26. Kambita, D. y Hamanenga, J. (2018). The impact of problem solving approach on students’ performance in mathematical induction: A case of Mukuba University. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(5), 97–105.
  27. Martínez, X. (2017). Pedagogías metacognitivas y la construcción de un foro dialógico. Innovación Educativa, 17(74), 8–10.
  28. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.
  29. Schraw G. y Gutierrez A. P. (2015). Metacognitive Strategy Instruction that Highlights the Role of Monitoring and Control Processes. In: Peña-Ayala A. (eds) Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 76. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_1
  30. Wellman H. (1985). The origins of metacognition. In Forrest-Pressley, Mackinnon y Waller (Eds). Metacognition, cognition, and human performance Vol.1, Theoretical Perspectives. (London: Academia Press, Inc), 1-31.
  31. Venancio, M. A. S. (2020). Metacognição: um estudo exploratório com o game educacional A Fazendinha Matemática aplicado em estudantes do ensino fundamental. [Dissertação, Vitória da Conquista, Brasil]: Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. http://www2.uesb.br/ppg/ppgen/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/DISSERTA%C3%87%C3%83O-MARCIOANTONIO-S.-VENANCIO-1.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.